AI Control Gap Assessment
Give us one AI workflow.
We'll test it against real attacks.
You walk away with a 6–10 page findings report on an AI workflow. See more
Pick one chatbot, AI application, agent, or model workflow your team needs to approve. We'll show where controls hold, where they break, and what that means for security, legal, and risk.
Tell us what to assess.
Three quick fields. Everything else is optional, it just helps us route faster.
What happens next
-
In 3 days
We confirm whether your workflow appears in scope and propose a 30-minute scoping call.
-
Scoping call
We define success criteria together. What you need to learn. What would make this report useful to security, legal, risk, or leadership.
-
~2 weeks
A short report (6–10 pages) showing what we tested, where controls held up, where they may break, mapped to OWASP LLM Top 10 and MITRE ATLAS, with recommended next steps.
The report is yours. We'd love to talk about what comes next, but there's no obligation.
We really appreciate the depth of analysis that the 0DIN product brings to AI threats."
What you get back
Evidence your team can act on.
A focused first-pass report on one scoped workflow: what we tested, where controls held, where they may break, and what your team should do about it.
Findings report
What we tested, where controls held, where they broke, and severity for each gap, with reproducible methodology.
Framework mapping
Findings tagged to OWASP LLM Top 10 and MITRE ATLAS today. NIST AI RMF + ISO 42001 control mapping drafted; external review in progress.
Next-step plan
Ranked, scoped actions your AppSec, AI platform, and Legal/Compliance teams can own. Tied to findings, not boilerplate.
This is a focused first-pass assessment, not a full penetration test or certification. Findings stay scoped to your workflow. Prompts and responses are deleted after report delivery unless you request retention. Vendor-side findings follow responsible disclosure.